Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Zunes on the Jewish Holocaust against the Lebanese People.

To the american jew, and self proclaimed left wing supporter of the racist jews-only state in palestine (jos), stephen zunes, it was america who pushed the jews into the attack on lebanon. "There is increasing evidence that Israel instigated a disastrous war on Lebanon largely at the behest of the United States. The administration of President George W Bush was set on crippling Hezbollah, the radical Shi'ite political movement that maintains a sizable block of seats in the Lebanese parliament." (Stephen Zunes ‘The logic of war’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HH23Ak03.html Aug 23, 2006). America’s brutal wasp imperialists forced the peace loving, multi-cultural, jos into launching a psychotic attack on lebanese civilians and the country’s civilian infrastructure. Jewish society didn’t like their country’s aerial attacks on lebanese civilians and certainly didn’t want a ground war to be launched against hezbollah. "Despite US encouragement that Israel continue the war, Israel's right-wing prime minister has come under increasing criticism at home, with polls from the newspaper Ha'aretz indicating that only 39% of Israelis would support the planned expansion of the ground offensive." (Stephen Zunes ‘The logic of war’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HH23Ak03.html Aug 23, 2006). However, zunes’s zionist whitewashing of reality refuses to confront the possibility that olmert’s popularity plummetted because of his failure to win the war not his willingness to fight it. It also ignores the reality that benjamin netanhayu’s soaring popularity suggested that what the jews wanted was a more comprehensive and brutal ground war rather than the mock invasion carried out solely for the benefit of rescuing the reputations of the olmert government and the invincible jewish military.

Zunes’s evidence for his contention that it was all the wasps’ fault consists of statements made by:

* consultants to the bush administration, "Seymour Hersh, in the August 21 New Yorker, quotes a Pentagon consultant" (a very unreliable source of truth);

* american politicians "Rumsfeld was "delighted that Israel is our stalking horse"." (an even more unreliable source);

* jewish administrators, "some Israeli officials, including top military officials, are furious at Bush for pushing Olmert into war" (more unreliable sources);

* jewish commentators in the american media, "the office of the White House press secretary released a list of talking points that included reference to a Los Angeles Times op-ed by Max Boot, senior fellow for national-security studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. The article .. urges an Israeli attack against Syria. "Israel needs to hit the Assad regime. Hard," argued Boot, referring to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. "If it does, it will be doing Washington's dirty work."" (way-off the scale of unreliability); and,

opinion polls in the jos, "there is growing recognition of US responsibility for getting them (jews) into that mess (in lebanon)."

Not exactly the sort of evidence on which to build a cast iron conclusion! What undermines his conclusion even more is the great bulk of evidence to the contrary - the "stranglehold" of the jewish lobby over congress; the jewish dominated american media; the jewish influence over america’s military industrial complex; and the primary source of america’s foreign policies over the last five years – ‘A Clean Break’ – the modern day version of the ‘The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ written by dual citizen jewish conspirators.

In order to make the jews look good amidst the rubble they have created in lebanon, zunes has to make hezbollah look bad. He does this by condemning its allegedly reactionary social agenda. "The majority of Lebanese opposed Hezbollah, both its reactionary fundamentalist social agenda as well as its insistence on maintaining an armed presence independent of the country's elected government." (Stephen Zunes ‘The logic of war’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HH23Ak03.html Aug 23, 2006). Zunes possesses a peculiar trait of reversing the results of opinion polls so that warmongering jews in the jos oppose the war whilst opinion polls suggest the highly popular hezbollah have only minority support. Such a nebulous phrase as "reactionary fundamentalist social agenda" will appeal to the lefty marxist brigade, dominated as it is by jews, in the same way a low cut dress would appeal to a voyeur. The phrase is designed to cover up the fact that hezbollah’s "agenda" has transformed southern lebanon from grinding poverty into decent levels of economic prosperity; has fostered tolerance and pluralism with lebanon’s other faiths; and has played a critical role in reinforcing lebanon’s fragile democratic system. So, helping people to prosper, supporting multi-culturalism, and participating in democratic politics are now basic tenets of a reactionary fundamentalist agenda? Well it’s a long time since I had a good laugh at marxism but this certainly helps to bring back the tears. To zunes, hezbollah can be swept aside as a reactionary force in comparison to the wonderfully enlightened, secular, humane and peace-loving, jos.

Zunes refuses to praise hezbollah for its heroic military resistance to global imperialism. (It’s to be expected that he wouldn’t praise resistance to global jewish imperialism but surely he could have said something positive about resistance to what he believes was an example of global american imperialism?). On the contrary, like most neocons and other assorted neo-lefties, neo-liberals, and neo-greenies, zunes blames hezbollah for the jews’ grossly disproportionate attacks on lebanese civilians. "Hezbollah's provocative capture of the two Israeli soldiers that prompted the Israeli attacks" (Stephen Zunes ‘The logic of war’ http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HH23Ak03.html Aug 23, 2006). If a border scuffle resulting in the capture of two soldiers is now enough to legitimize the psychotic bombardment of a country’s civilians and infrastructure then ooman civilization is in deep trouble.

Zunes’s completes his whitewash of global jewish imperialism by claiming that america’s forcing of the jews into a war against lebanon was against jewish interests. "By contrast, the Bush administration and an overwhelming bipartisan majority of Congress clearly believed it was in the United States' interest for Israel to pursue Washington's "dirty work" for an indefinite period, regardless of its negative implications for Israel's legitimate security interests." Quite how this war was in america’s interests is impossible to determine no matter what the jewish financed muppets in congress and the media might say.


Post a Comment

<< Home